Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:15:24 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1123928: transition: ghc-9.10.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1123928,
regarding transition: ghc-9.10.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1123928: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1123928
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:ghc
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
We (the Debian Haskell team) would like to start the transition to
update GHC to version 9.10.3. GHC has already been updated/tested in
experimental and seems to work.
As part of this transition, we need to update ~350 packages to a newer
version, and do a sourceful upload for the rest of the Haskell libraries
(~1000 packages).
Ben file:
title = "ghc-9.10.3";
is_affected = .source ~ "ghc" | .build-depends ~ "ghc" | .build-depends ~
"haskell-devscripts" | .depends ~ "libghc-" ;
is_good = !.uninstallable ~ "yes";
is_bad = .uninstallable ~ "yes";
Thank you,
--
Ilias
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2026-02-07 21:21:18 +0200, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2026 at 04:31PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I understood the new DFSG team tries to adjust priorities to the need of
> > developers. Thus from your mail arise two interesting questions:
> >
> > 1. Is there any chance to automatically know what packages do influence
> > the transition? I have made extremely good experiences by making
> > some ITP bug blocking an RC bug in some other package. This relation
> > influences the ranking of the package inside the new queue drastically.
> > You might like to try this.
> > If you see other machine obtainable signals influencing a transition
> > please let the DFSG team know.
>
> I didn't know we can influence the ranking of the packages, this is really
> interesting. Right now, there is nothing we can use to automatically bump
> the priority for the Haskell packages currently in the NEW queue, but going
> forward we could have ITP bugs blocking the transition bug
> (https://bugs.debian.org/1123928). DFSG team, could we implement something
> like this?
>
>
> > 2. Can you simply make a list of the blockers for the moment as long as
> > the automated ranking is not implemented yet?
>
> The following packages are currently in the NEW queue (all of them less than
> a day old) and are blocking the transition:
>
> * haskell-djot
> * haskell-crypton-socks
> * haskell-crypto-token
> * haskell-text-iso8601
> * haskell-postgresql-libpq-pkgconfig
>
> We still have 10 more packages that will need to clear the NEW queue, will
> work on them over the next days.
ghc and reverse dependencies migrated. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
