On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 12:34 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > ... > > I'm unsure if autoreject is the solution (if that's what you meant, > > I'm not > > sure I got your intention). Some uploads could be excepted to > > unstable, but > > maybe not allowing that is in the end a price that's acceptable to > > solve > > this automatically. Let's not haste into a solution but think > > carefully. > > ... > > A hard autoreject would be bad, since there are (rare) cases where a > package hits NEW that already has a more recent version in > experimental for unrelated reasons.
I'm not suggesting any such thing, so that's good. Cheers, Andrew. > > > Paul > > cu > Adrian -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Porirua, New Zealand +64 (27) 288 6741 Whereof one cannot speak, thereon one must remain silent. -- Wittgenstein ----------------------------------------------------------------------
