Hi Emilio, On 2026-06-25 15:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 24/06/2026 19:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi Emilio, > > > > On 2026-06-24 14:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > My preference would be to have some K3 boards, even if that means waiting > > > a > > > bit longer, so that we can further cut build time for large packages. > > > > I have been able to progress a bit on that front, thanks to SpacemiT, I > > got access to a K3 board. On the good side, the performance are > > impressive compared to the Unmatched boards we currently use, both in > > terms of CPU and NVMe speed. I measured a speed improvement of up > > between 6 to 8 compared to the current buildds. For instance the linux > > package from experimental builds in 2h30. > > That's pretty impressive. I wonder what the build time for gcc-16 would be, > though it's fine if you don't have an answer for that.
I just did the test, it took 23h24 to build gcc 16.1.0-2. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net
