Actually, maybe firefox-esr doesn't care about armel? I see that
firefox-esr ftbfs on trixie for armel (and has for some time), and
oldstable/lts doesn't appear to build armel?
If that's the case, then I won't bother and we can just go with deb13u4.
Chromium certainly doesn't care about armel.
On 8/18/26 14:09, Andres Salomon wrote:
deb13u4 failed on armel for a new reason; I'll need to prep deb13u5 once
I figure it out. At least it succeeded on the other archs.
On 8/15/26 21:16, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
[...]
I've prepared deb13u4 to fix all of those build failures. I've
attached a debdiff between deb13u3 and deb13u4. If it looks good, I'll
do a source-only upload to trixie.
