On 8/18/26 14:45, Andres Salomon wrote:
Actually, maybe firefox-esr doesn't care about armel? I see that
firefox-esr ftbfs on trixie for armel (and has for some time), and
oldstable/lts doesn't appear to build armel?
If that's the case, then I won't bother and we can just go with deb13u4.
Chromium certainly doesn't care about armel.
After an IRC discussion with Emilio (and based on chromium's upcoming
release) - please accept deb13u4 into s-p-u.
We'll need to do deb13u5 later on to fix armel, but there's some urgency
to get chromium w/ llvm 22 able to build on armhf/ppc64. I also haven't
been able to test s390x yet. So once deb13u4 is accepted, I'll be able
to see how the s390x build fares and any additional fixes needed there
can be included alongside armel fixes.
