On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:06:24AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:58:21PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > I've been trying to monitor the boost transition in hopes of being > > able to upload ICU 3.8 once it goes in. It looks like it's getting > > really close. Is that correct? I'm quite eager to go ahead and get > > ICU 3.8 uploaded to unstable because there are several other things > > that are waiting for this to happen. In particular, I'm holding > > xerces28 for ICU 3.8, and once that gets uploaded, I can work on > > transitioning packages from xerces27 to xerces28 (which doesn't cause > > a library transition since the two versions can coexist) and then > > removing xerces27. Also, new bugs are getting reported against ICU > > 3.6, and it would be better if I didn't have to try to resolve them > > without testing with ICU 3.8. If you think boost is going in soon and > > doesn't have any more hard problems blocking it, I'll continue to > > wait. Otherwise, if boost looks like it's stuck enough for ICU to > > join the party, I'd like to go ahead and upload. Thoughts? > > At long last, boost has cleared the jump, and you should feel free to upload > icu 3.8 now. Sorry for the long wait.
that's great! thank you :) -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
