Le May 12, 2008 07:45:11 pm Andreas Barth, vous avez écrit : > * Filipus Klutiero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080513 01:03]: > > Le May 12, 2008 07:32:54 am Alexander E. Patrakov, vous avez écrit : > > > Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > > > > Yes, this is normal behaviour: britney (the testing migration script) > > > > doesn't check build-dependencies. I don't know if it is release-team > > > > intention to change this in the future or not, but it is how it's > > > > working right now. > > > > > > Sorry for a stupid question, but how is it ensured in the Debian > > > project that all packages in stable are buildable in stable? > > > > The Debian project doesn't verify that. There are packages that FTBFS in > > stable. However, it's rare, because there are never large numbers of > > packages that FTBFS in testing to begin with. > > The Debian project does verify it. That doesn't mean there are no bugs, > but they're clearly bugs. There's a difference between having some release team members act at times on debcheck and/or FTBFS bugs and having project infrastructure to "ensure that all packages in stable are buildable in stable". I didn't mean that nobody does anything to avoid these bugs or that FTBFS weren't considered bugs. > > > If you don't understand the way release management actually works (and > it does work), please just don't answer on mail to debian-release. If you prefer denigrating my contributions to answering questions to the list, please do so more convincingly.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't a discussion list but the role account of the > release team. It might be time to enforce that a bit more. I have no idea what you mean. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a list, not an account. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
