On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Please binNMU librsvg against libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1, due to bug > #496125.
Can you elaborate on why a binNMU is appropriate here, please? If this is ABI breakage in libxml2, that's a serious bug that should be fixed in that package, not papered over with binNMUs. And anyway, no, libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1 isn't in testing (or testing-proposed-updates), so binNMUs into testing are not exactly possible at present. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
