On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:21:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Please binNMU librsvg against libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1, due to bug > > #496125. > > Can you elaborate on why a binNMU is appropriate here, please? If this is > ABI breakage in libxml2, that's a serious bug that should be fixed in that > package, not papered over with binNMUs. > > And anyway, no, libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-2+lenny1 isn't in testing (or > testing-proposed-updates), so binNMUs into testing are not exactly possible > at present.
I just uploaded libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-3 containing the fix that doesn't break ABI. Please make it transition to testing asap. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
