Hi Thomas, On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:32:49PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Please allow gnucash 2.2.6-2 into testing; this has a minimally invasive > patch to avoid a dangerous data-loss bug in an unusual usage case.
> (It turns out that sshfs returns ENOSYS on a link call. This is wildly > wrong; it has no business doing so, especially when EPERM is already the > documented error for the filesystem-doesn't-support-it case.) > Regardless, gnucash did poorly in this case, and the patch in 2.2.6-2 > fixes the (release-critical) problem. Given that sshfs's errno return is "wildly wrong", is there a release-critical bug filed about this somewhere too? Possibly on glibc, which I think is responsible for ensuring that the errno values returned from its userspace functions are compliant, even when the kernel's return values need to be mapped? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
