On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:44:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Given that sshfs's errno return is "wildly wrong",
The errors are not "wrong". The lists in the documentation are not terminal. The open group spec say[1]: | The ERRORS section on each page specifies whether an error will be returned, or | whether it may be returned. Implementations will not generate a different error | number from the ones described here for error conditions described in this | specification, but may generate additional errors unless explicitly disallowed | for a particular function. > Possibly on glibc, > which I think is responsible for ensuring that the errno values returned > from its userspace functions are compliant, even when the kernel's return > values need to be mapped? And which value should they be mapped to? Bastian [1]: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7990989775/xsh/errors.html -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
