On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:12:08AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Are any of these packages actually buildable now? For instance, > > This is a good question. Please postpone the binNMU.
Also, it appears my list was truncated. > I will report the full list of packages that are actually buildable, > and the the list of -dev package that Depends on libjpeg62-dev. The following package should be fine for a binNMU: I did a test-build with pbuilder on i386 this morning. dcraw 8.86-1 grace 5.1.22-2 hasciicam 1.0-1 htmldoc 1.8.27-4.1 inventor 2.1.5-10-14 libsfml 1.5+repack1-3 nxcomp 3.2.0-7-1.1 steghide 0.5.1-9 vtk 5.2.1-14 xjig 2.4-13 > > anything that depends on libtiff4?-dev is not, because libtiff4-dev > > depends on libjpeg62-dev. Neither is anything that depends on > > libgtk2.0-dev, because of the dependency chain > > libgtk2.0-dev -> libcairo2-dev -> libdirectfb-dev -> libjpeg62-dev. > > Fortunately, while there are a large number of packages that Depends on > libjpeg62-dev, only a small number are causing conflicts. Here the list of packages that cause conflicts due to dependencies on libjpeg62-dev: libcupsimage2-dev libdirectfb-dev libdjvulibre-dev libgd2-noxpm-dev libgdal1-dev libhdf5-serial-dev libqt3-mt-dev libsane-dev libsdl-image1.2-dev libtiff4-dev libwmf-dev libwraster3-dev They should be updated to Depends and Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead. Unfortunately that is likely to cause packages build-depending on libjpeg62-dev to fail to build, so they will need to be fixed too. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
