Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 23:08:41 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > >> It is API compatible. As I said, I have rebuilt locally the 311 packages >> that build-depends on libjpeg62-dev against libjpeg8-dev, so there is no >> risk of API incompatibility. >> > Then they shouldn't have different names.
Indeed or put it differently: if you want to change the name of the package, it should provide libjpeg62-dev instead of conflicting with it. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
