On 2010-02-11 20:21 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 19:44:58 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2010-02-11 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> >> > Bill Allombert wrote: >> >> >> >> libjpeg62-dev need to be kept for LSB compatibility. >> > >> > Can you point me to the section that points to that need? >> >> http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Desktop-generic/LSB-Desktop-generic/libjpeg62.html#LIBJPEG >> >> It's the same in LSB 4.0. >> > Doesn't that allow us to keep libjpeg62 but get rid of libjpeg62-dev?
If Debian has no interest of being a platform for building LSB packages, surely. I don't know if this is a concern or not. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
