Patrik Fimml <[email protected]> writes: > libgoffice's packaging is currently buggy, not changing the package name > with SONAME. Please rebuild abiword as an intermediate fix until the > libgoffice packaging problem is resolved. (see #570010) > > nmu abiword_2.8.2-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgoffice with different > SONAME (closes: #572043)" > dw abiword_2.8.2-1 . ALL . -m "libgoffice-0-8 (>= 0.8.0-1)"
binNMUs were scheduled for 2.8.1-2, but all failed to build due to
#569373.
2.8.2-1 has been uploaded after libgoffice had been changed, thus is
already built against the new goffice version and a binNMU wouldn't
change anything. #572043 has been reported against 2.8.1-2 from testing,
which is known to be affected. Why do you think a binNMU of 2.8.2-1
would solve this issue?
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
165: SuSE
Nürnberger Windows (Andreas Gradert)
pgpoLTcn7IVdS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
