Your message dated Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:54:27 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#572124: nmu: abiword_2.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #572124,
regarding nmu: abiword_2.8.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
572124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
libgoffice's packaging is currently buggy, not changing the package name
with SONAME. Please rebuild abiword as an intermediate fix until the
libgoffice packaging problem is resolved. (see #570010)
nmu abiword_2.8.2-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgoffice with different
SONAME (closes: #572043)"
dw abiword_2.8.2-1 . ALL . -m "libgoffice-0-8 (>= 0.8.0-1)"
Thanks,
Patrik
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
A binNMU of 2.8.2-1 is no longer necessary because goffice fixed its
package naming and abiword 2.8.2-2 is waiting for a sponsor, thus
closing this bug report.
Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
