Your message dated Sun, 4 Jul 2010 10:49:58 -0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#587983: nmu: hapm_0.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #587983,
regarding nmu: hapm_0.7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
587983: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587983
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu

Trying to solve a dependence rebuilding it to kfreebsd-i386 arch.

nmu hapm_0.7 . kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Trying to solve a dependence."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Ok Adam, I understood. I was trying understand the binNMU process and
I don't saw that the heartbeat is absent in kfreebsd yet.

Sorry for this inconvenient. I am closing this bug now.

Regards,

Eriberto

2010/7/4 Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 12:02 -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
>
> The only obvious problem I can see is that hapm depends on heartbeat,
> which isn't available on kfreebsd-*; that isn't fixable via a binNMU and
> would require sourceful changes to hapm (either to depend on an
> alternative package / solution on kfreebsd-* or to not build on those
> architectures if there isn't an alternative).


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to