On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > non-free is currently not auto-built, so the new fsl packages are only > available on amd64.
Ah, right -- I will take care of that. > > Shall I simply upload a bugfix for fsl to unstable? > > If I'm reading #592242 correctly, the suggested fix is that fsl should > conflict with cyrus-clients-2.2? This would appear to be a violation of > policy 10.1. The 'fsl' package only provides /usr/bin symlinks for all tools in the 'fsl-4.1' package -- users do not need to have them, that is merely a convenience package that avoids configuring the environment manually. Due to a number of rather generic names multiple file conflicts with other packages exists -- none of them can be dealt with using the alternatives system. It was my impression that a package conflict would be appropriate, since the only other possibility would be to not have such a package at all. Moreover, the scope of any of these packages makes it rather unlikely that they get installed on the same system. Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100809120146.ga14...@meiner
