On Mi, 2010-08-25 at 17:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 20:25:18 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > APT (keep [email protected] in CC for this) > > ===================================== > > Will the APT 0.7.26 transition still be started? (mvo reported it in > > April, 579795) [and it can fix potential segfaults in python-apt]. > > > It's in progress now. > > > python-apt > > ----------- > > > > I have code for a new python-apt release in bzr, fixing a few bugs; > > nothing problematic: > > debian/changelog | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > doc/source/conf.py | 9 +++++++-- > > doc/source/library/apt_pkg.rst | 9 +++++++++ > > python/apt_pkgmodule.cc | 2 ++ > > python/configuration.cc | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > > python/tag.cc | 5 +++++ > > 6 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > I also want to push the version to 0.7.100 for the Squeeze release, but > > this is purely cosmetic (as 0.7.9X were meant as preview releases). > > python-apt FTBFS in sid on some archs (see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-apt&suite=unstable). > The diffstat above looks reasonable, can you upload ASAP (assuming it > will build)?
I uploaded 0.7.97 which seems to build correctly in my local sbuild. And just for your information, the FTBFS was caused by the recent Python 3 changes. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282820059.28728.7.ca...@jak-thinkpad
