Hi, On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Alessio Treglia <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, hi all, > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Peter Leese > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was supplied the patch by a third party. His reasoning behind doing this >> way was that he did not want >> a random filename, but a filename that was related to the name used in the >> URL. If this failed (i.e >> 001-<filename> to 099-<filename> already exists, then fall back to >> mkstemp()). This was OK with me so I accepted >> the patch. > > Peter, thanks for the reply. > > Release managers, what do you think about that? >
Bump, any news? Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia <[email protected]> Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
