On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 11:43 +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: > Hi Peter, hi all, > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Peter Leese > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was supplied the patch by a third party. His reasoning behind doing this > > way was that he did not want > > a random filename, but a filename that was related to the name used in the > > URL. If this failed (i.e > > 001-<filename> to 099-<filename> already exists, then fall back to > > mkstemp()). This was OK with me so I accepted > > the patch. > > Peter, thanks for the reply. > > Release managers, what do you think about that?
It's a temporary file, so the name shouldn't really matter anyway. I'd still prefer that it just called mkstemp(), but please feel free to upload, and let us know once the package has been accepted. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
