hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 08:34 +0900, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote: >> Please unblock package hyperestraier. 1.4.13-2 basically >> fixes FTBFS bugs introduced in 1.4.13-1. > > That's a fairly broad definition of "basically", given this: > >> hyperestraier (1.4.13-2) unstable; urgency=low > [...] >> * libestraier-ruby-doc: >> new package. split ruby api documentation. > > Introducing new packages during freeze is not particularly helpful; > tying an RC-bug fix up with it less so still.
I've recognized this, as it should be introduced in 1.4.13-1, when I added separate package for supporting ruby 1.9 series. (to avoid including duplicate documents for them) > As 1.4.13-1 never managed to migrate to testing due to the FTBFS bugs, > afaics none of the bugs fixed in -2 are regressions from the version > currently in Squeeze; I'm debating whether we should therefore just > leave 1.4.9-1.4 in Squeeze. Please consider to update 1.4.13, though I know that I couldn't push it to testing before freeze because of my inmature packaging; 1.4.9 (released 2006/11) is pretty old, even though for lenny. No users want to use it. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
