On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 14:37 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On 2010-10-20, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2010-10-18, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2010-10-15, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On 2010-10-11, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> On 2010-10-06, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> On 2010-10-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> I went through the security issues fixed in sid, but not yet in > >>>>>> Squeeze. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ I didn't look into the diffs against current testing, some might > >>>>>> be too intrusive for which we need to poke maintainers with a long > >>>>>> stick to fix it through t-p-u. ] Please review the following: > > More unblock requests: > ust/0.7-2.1 -> CVE-2010-3386
testing has 0.5 and the new upstream isn't quickly reviewable. Could be fixed via tpu although it would be useful if that took in to account Julien's comments in #598309 > mailman/1:2.1.13-4.1 -> CVE-2010-3089 > cluster-agents/1:1.0.3-3.1 -> CVE-2010-3389 Unblocked by Julien. > pidgin/2.7.4-2 -> CVE-2010-3711 (might need a targeted tpu fix?) There seem to be quite a lot of other code changes and rearrangement in the diff, so tpu would be preferable. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
