On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:12:08AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > why wasn't this fixed (e.g. through an NMU) in unstable, too? The > announcement doesn't even mention unstable albeit it's the same version.
<sarcasm> We currently seem to have a slightly better protection for the unstable package; it doesn't work at all (at least for me). *** An error occurred: Program ending: Bad arg length for Socket::inet_ntoa, length is 0, should be 4 at /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiirc/nph-irc.cgi line 673, <IP> line 7. </sarcasm> I'm not sure if that might be IPv6 related. There's some upstream activity so it would be nice to know if des@d.o is already known to be MIA before pushing this for removal or orphan the package. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110223141123.GA10794@marvin