On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it. > Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be > confusing. I will report bug to packages that Depends on libjpeg62-dev > as a first step. > Alright, thank you.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
