On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it. > > Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be > > confusing. I will report bug to packages that Depends on libjpeg62-dev > > as a first step. > > > Alright, thank you.
Done, 18 bugs reported, #629960 to #629978 minus #629971. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110609220257.GA31035@yellowpig
