On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Any update for this request?
Arguably, that doesn't really tie in with: > On 11/03/2011 01:06 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Done. Please review the attached debdiff patch and let me know when to > > proceed. I was rather hoping that the manual page updates might have landed in unstable in the meantime, to be honest; even if they are "just" documentation, it would have given people a chance to highlight any issues with the changes and there's no real need (imho) to wait for an upstream release in order to apply a documentation change. fwiw, the last debdiff you supplied doesn't appear to include the below change; otoh, it does fix an instance of the problem which isn't the one I highlighted. ;-) > ++of this path. Higher number have a higher priority. > > s/number/&s/ With that change, please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
