On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:40 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On 11/10/2011 01:29 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > fwiw, the last debdiff you supplied doesn't appear to include the below > > change; otoh, it does fix an instance of the problem which isn't the one > > I highlighted. ;-) > > > >> > ++of this path. Higher number have a higher priority. > >> > > >> > s/number/&s/ > > With that change, please go ahead. > > Thank you. Done for the stable release and uploaded to > stable-proposed-updates.
For the record, this was accepted with the 13:52 dinstall. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
