On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:45:18PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 04/04/12 14:15, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >On 04/04/12 14:11, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> > >>This happens automatically when the last dependency of iceowl is > >>gone from testing. In this case, that appears to be > >>iceowl-l10n/1.0~b2-1 (see below). > >> > > > >My removal hint takes care of removing iceowl-l10n too, fwiw. (It > >doesn't make sense to keep iceowl-l10n in testing w/o iceowl). > > > > Just a clarification: iceowl-l10n in testing is only useful for iceowl. > In sid, things are different since iceowl-extension is now built from > icedove (since 8.0~b4-2). Removing iceowl-l10n from testing now will > allow us to get rid of iceowl/testing. It will migrate again once > icedove is ready (if no other issues pop up in the meantime). Thanks for the clarification. This makes my other mail superfluous. Cheers, -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
