Hi, On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:50:04 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> I guess we can remove jmpost but, for safety, please wait > a while, I'll check it deliberately. Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built from ptex-bin. jbibtex-bin is also built from ptex-bin as Adam wrote. So we are in a very complicated situation. jmpost is not replaced with any binary of texlive packages. jbibtex-bin is replaced with pbibtex basically but is convenient for texfam. But both jmpost and jbibtex-bin are built (as byproducts) from ptex-bin which gets FTBFS bug. So we might admit they simply go away. Best regards, 2012-4-27(Fri) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120427.092810.149827361451960553.atsuh...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp
