On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:15 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 05.05.2012 16:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> So I guess you can schedule the first round of binNMUs, i.e.
> >> clutter-gesture, clutter-gst and clutter-imcontext.
[...]
>   clutter-imcontext was on the
> > "doesn't need rebuilding" list, but appears to have cogl dependencies on
> > a handful of arches - specifically, armhf, hurd and s390x.
> 
> Right. I just had looked at the amd64 version back then, which didn't
> have a libcogl5 dependency. Most likely because at that time libclutter
> did not depend on libcogl yet, while newer clutter versions do.
> As the armhf, hurd and s390x builds were built against newer versions,
> they got a dependency on libcogl5.
> 
> So I'd say just rebuild all archs for clutter-imcontext, so we have a
> consistent state now.

Okay; scheduled.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1336227993.12365.43.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to