On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > [...] > > > - libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (>= 4.8.30-2), > > > + libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), > [...] > > Is that the only (non-changelog) change in the package? If so then feel > > free to get it uploaded and then come back to us with an unblock > > request. > > You appear to have done the former of those, but never bothered with the > latter...
There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem). I wanted them solved before I request ia32-libs goes into testing. > > Note that in any case the package won't migrate with #677741 > > in the way. > > That wasn't meant as a suggestion to simply downgrade the bug :-p I downgraded the bug because the critical issues have been solved. That means that many users can install ia32-libs and use it just fine. But not everyone can. So there is still room for improvement. Ia32-libs is at a stage where it is possible to release it with a slightly reduced usefullness. But idealy I would like there to be no regression to squeeze, namely the two issues above. > In an earlier thread you mentioned a number of multiarch issues with http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762 The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most critical and trivial there is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777 That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that. > ia32-libs-gtk; what's the current status there? Also: > > out of date on ia64: ia32-libs-gtk (from 20120102) Pending removal. > Regards, > > Adam MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120718113459.GC5976@frosties
