On 2012-07-31 11:02, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-07-18 13:34, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> [...] >> >> There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl >> (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem). >> > > [...] > > It is my understanding that lesstif2 is the last M-A conversion needed > for ia32-libs. Assuming the changes to lesstif2 and mtink are > reasonable, cyrus-sasl just needs a "no-change" upload and ia32-libs is > good to go. >
mtink is in testing, cyrus-sasl2 is fixed in sid with an unblock. lesstif2 does not have an unblock, but assuming it got one, it could migrate with the next Britney run. >> [...] >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762 >> >> The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most >> critical and trivial there is: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777 >> >> That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on >> libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that. >> >> [...] > > > It seems like most of those bugs are libraries needing converted to M-A > (i.e. usr/lib -> usr/lib/$MADIR) and #650777 is the "exception". > > What do we "lose" if only the "trivial" bugs are fixed? By trivial I > mean only patches that add "Multi-Arch: $val" fields like #650777 (so no > moving of libraries from usr/lib to usr/lib/$MADIR). > > ~Niels > > [...] I would still like to get an idea of what needs the last packages unfixed packages. Having reviewed some of the bugs, I realized that some of them have no patches, liborbit2 seems to invovle plugins that will most likely entangle "unrelated" packages, at least libbonobo has an unanswered "interesting question"... ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
