On 21/07/12 15:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Aside from the question of whether the content can actually have > authorship asserted over it in the first place, we've historically > treated licensing issues in stable where the situation has subsequently > been clarified in unstable as documentation updates which don't qualify > for an update in stable on their own.
Thanks for the clarification. > Particularly as the package in stable is in non-free I'm afraid I'm not > currently convinced that the proposed changes should be applied in > stable. That's fine by me. I only prepared the diff should the release team feel an update was required. (IMHO the files in question aren't copyrightable, but that's another issue). Feel free to tag as wontfix/notabug/whatever you see fit. Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
