On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 07:25 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 12:29 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > > So, in that case I'd like you to let pass rev. 6 (1.3.3-6) > > > packages from sid. > > > > You're supposed to provide a rationale, not just say "oh, go on, > > please". ;-p > > > > From a quick look at the diff from the version in testing, lintian fixes > > generally don't qualify for unblocks, nor does a complete rewrite of the > > copyright file in to DEP-5 format. > > > > I guess one could claim that some of the changes are documentation > > updates, but that's certainly stretching it for the copyright file. > > > Basically, the DEP-5 involved primarily more detailed licensing terms > for the game's artwork. Which was not included in the past.
>From an unblock / review perspective, it would have been more helpful to have simply added those to the existing file. :-( > Few > things remain to clean-up for some data files, I might need to > contact designers/authors for that. Is there an ETA for having that sorted out? > Second, with the new packaging layout I also created an VCs repo > under the pkg-games umbrella, so that we are able to maintain > and support on stable releases. That's already been in testing since May, so isn't really an argument for an unblock. ;-p > > What's this change about? > > > > -build-predeb/torcs-data:: > > +binary-predeb/torcs-data:: > > # removing empty script until it's ready > > rm -f debian/torcs-data/usr/share/games/torcs/telemetry/telemetry.sh > > > > Also, why does debian/rules now contain *two* copies of that removal > > line? > > > Well, you've already found the answer. To the second question, yes. As I indicated at the time, I'd still appreciate the first being answered. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
