On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 01:03 +0200, Janoš Guljaš wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the daemon always runs as "uwsgi-core", would it be worth changing > > the calls to use "--name uwsgi-core" or similar, instead of dropping the > > use of --name entirely? I'm pondering how likely it is that s-s-d will > > end up killing the wrong process if the daemon has died and the PID has > > been re-used. Maybe I'm just overly paranoid. [...] > I agree that removing the name option can make more damage then good, > so I am sending debdiff with a patch that is changing how uwsgi_reload > function works. That function is overriding the main's argv[0] value > with a value provided by the readlink. The patch is just using argv[0] > in execvp as the first argument. That way the process name is > preserved, even if the path in argv[0] is in relative form.
Assuming the new package has been appropriately tested, please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
