Hi Thomas Now I have checked and it is better to use the patch I proposed before. That is make a new testing branch based on the contents of testing instead of uploading to unstable. This avoids unnecessarily complex replace rules (to avoid upgrade from current unstable).
I'll do that when I get a green light from release team that the patch is ok. // Ola On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, I forgot to reply to this one. > > On 01/10/2013 03:35 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi Thomas > > > > Ok, thanks. Where do I find the folsom packaging? > > Same place. It's all in Alioth. It's just in the debian/experimental > branch instead of debian/unstable. If you wish, you can use the > openstack-auto-builder.git script to build all of our packages. > > > If -6 things are included in folsom I think it is better to upload a > > special testing variant instead of -7 as the replace rules would be > > too complicated otherwise. > > > > // Ola > > I'm not sure what you mean by the above or what your intentions are. > Anyway you choose, you will need some version replaces+breaks IMO, but I > don't see it as a problem. > > Thomas > -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ---- / [email protected] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [email protected] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
