On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:39 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 31.01.2013 17:36, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >>
> >> As per ยง5.13.3. Direct updates to testing, I'd like to ask
> >> permission for direct upload to testing for package gdcm.
[...]
> > Please attach a debdiff of the proposed upload to this bug log, as suggested
> > in Neil's earlier mail.
> 
> Attached. And deb was dupload'ed.

Unfortunately it FTBFS on armhf. The control file still lists the -cil
packages as built on that architecture, which then fails because the
build-dependencies aren't available.

It looks like control.in has a substitution variable which updates both
the build-dependency lists and the architecture lists for the binary
packages. Was debian/control directly edited in this case instead?
(Maybe because the mono packages in wheezy still list armhf as
supported, which this upload is intended to be a move towards fixing.)

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to