On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:39 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 31.01.2013 17:36, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >> >> >> As per ยง5.13.3. Direct updates to testing, I'd like to ask >> >> permission for direct upload to testing for package gdcm. > [...] >> > Please attach a debdiff of the proposed upload to this bug log, as >> > suggested >> > in Neil's earlier mail. >> >> Attached. And deb was dupload'ed. > > Unfortunately it FTBFS on armhf. The control file still lists the -cil > packages as built on that architecture, which then fails because the > build-dependencies aren't available. > > It looks like control.in has a substitution variable which updates both > the build-dependency lists and the architecture lists for the binary > packages. Was debian/control directly edited in this case instead? > (Maybe because the mono packages in wheezy still list armhf as > supported, which this upload is intended to be a move towards fixing.)
Correct -again-, I know I should not have done that. Anyway I'll wait until mono properly enter testing and then -as Niels explained- will fix both testing+unstable Sorry for the mess, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUsxh+VwFmJsz4ePTFvGjLv1JccKSk_uZikGq0uGv=hk...@mail.gmail.com
