On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 13:15 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Op vrijdag 15 februari 2013 17:58:23 schreef Adam D. Barratt: > > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 10:41 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > [ cups (1.4.4-7+squeeze2) stable-security; urgency=high ] > > > > Our sanity check grumbled about this one, as p-u has +squeeze3; is that > > intentional? I can't remember what we've done in such situations > > previously. > > First of all, let's make it clear that this isn't a blocker for accepting the > current packages right now: they are an improvement over what's currently in > squeeze also without the squeeze3 update, and this one fix pertains to a man > page which is not relevant to ia32-libs.
Indeed. > The issue of adding proposed-updates as a source for building ia32-libs was > discussed last year on this mailinglist. The SRM by way of Philipp seemed to > suggest that it was not desirable. I'm not decided anyway and left the final > decision to the SRM, which to my knowledge wasn't yet followed up on: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/12/msg00399.html Thanks for the pointer; I'd obviously forgotten that discussion. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
