On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I think this looks entirely reasonable that they are promoted to key > packages for as long as we use them for building install media. > > * I suppose we should also add a faux package for these packages to > help Britney prioritise that it remains installable.
On this note, should the packages used by DSA and by debian.org services be added to the key packages list? https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/mirror/debian.org.git/tree/debian/control That would also cover the packages requested by Thomas as the OpenStack images are built on cdbuilder.d.o IIRC. It seems they are missing from the debian.org debian/control in git though. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6hw7zudd34m2fuhwayxnxxs1rzlnho2cicr2sdcip5...@mail.gmail.com
