Hello, Lucas. On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> ruby-defaults (4.6) experimental; urgency=low > > * Remove the Ruby policy from the package. It is no longer applied to ruby > packages anyway. > * Make all binary packages transitional packages for their ruby1.8 > counterparts. This source package can be dropped after the wheezy release. > * Upload to experimental. Changes are very intrusive and need > extensive testing. I replaced ruby packages on fresh natty with your versions and all seems fine. No one of my work projects affected by changes (at least for 1.9.1). > Note that we have two alternatives trees (one for ruby, one for gem). It's not > convenient to have a single one with alternatives. I think that it would make > sense to have a separate "ruby-switcher" tool, that would: > - change all alternatives at the same time > - ensure that needed native packages are installed > Any takers? Probably I can take this. We need ruby-switcher to keep in sync versions for ruby and gem via alternatives system. Other thing i would like to keep in sync and switch with ruby version is /var/lib/gems/*/bin/. Can we manage it via alternatives system too? -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1299510410.4444.11.camel@beast
