Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 07/03/11 at 13:00 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Lucas, could you please ellaborate on why you think we should have > > different alternatives for each Ruby-related binary? > > I couldn't find a way to implement it. For ruby1.9.1, it would work. But > all slaves from a master alternative need to be in the same binary > package AFAIK, so we can't have a master alternative alternative in > ruby1.8 that controls a slave one in libgems-ruby1.8.
... because the slaves must be added by the same update-alternatives(1) call that adds the master link. I got it now. -- Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
