On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 09:59:10PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > Hey, > > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > > I have updated ruby-lockfile. It builds fine with pbuilder and > > is lintian clean. > > > > Changes since last upload: > > > > ruby-lockfile (2.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * Correct binary ruby versions tag. > > * Relax conflicts with transitional package to breaks. > > * Escape hyphens used in rlock.1 man page. > > > > -- Per Andersson <[email protected]> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:41:57 +0200 > > > > Please review and upload. Thanks in advance! > > Package seems fine, but there are a few (pedantic mode) lintian things > (which I don't always agree with, but with these I do): > > I: ruby-lockfile source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field > "priority" in package liblockfile-ruby
Ok, I actually don't care about this, but alright. ruby-trollop has the same issue though. > I: ruby-lockfile source: debian-watch-file-is-missing This issue also occurs in ruby-trollop. Please add a watch file. Cheers, Paul -- Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: [email protected] Jabber/GTalk: [email protected] | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
