On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Paul van Tilburg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: >> I have updated ruby-lockfile. It builds fine with pbuilder and >> is lintian clean. >> >> Changes since last upload: >> >> ruby-lockfile (2.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low >> >> * Correct binary ruby versions tag. >> * Relax conflicts with transitional package to breaks. >> * Escape hyphens used in rlock.1 man page. >> >> -- Per Andersson <[email protected]> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:41:57 +0200 >> >> Please review and upload. Thanks in advance! > > Package seems fine, but there are a few (pedantic mode) lintian things > (which I don't always agree with, but with these I do): > > I: ruby-lockfile source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field > "priority" in package liblockfile-ruby > I: ruby-lockfile source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > I: ruby-lockfile: extended-description-is-probably-too-short > > Also ruby-lockfile should be in section "ruby".
All fixed and pushed for both ruby-lockfile and ruby-trollop. -- Per > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: [email protected] > Jabber/GTalk: [email protected] | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CABYrXSQF-fc9tbasoxqi9jRV_vp=_mjdog7iqzoe3_4sefi...@mail.gmail.com
