Hi, thanks.
> - You should list yourself and perhaps others as uploaders. Again, I'd want the members of the ruby team (who usually approve new gems in pkg-ruby-extras) to have a look first. > - The license of debian/* (GPL-2.0+) and the rest of the package () > differ and patches in debian/patches/* would need to be relicensed > before they can go upstream. Is this intentional? Will fix that. > - One of the patches is missing the Applied-Upstream header. I did not find a policy that explains an applied upstream header. Could you point me to it, please? > - How did you figure out the copyright of the package? The only trace > I could find of a license for the package is in metadata.yml, stating > "licenses: - MIT". Why do you believe it is Expat licensed? I was told on #debian-ruby to use Expat instead of MIT if it's that specific variant of MIT. Isn't this the Expat license? https://github.com/hamstergem/hamster/blob/master/LICENSE That's what I found in their upstream github repo. The file is one year old and version 2.0.0 less old than that, so it should apply to the release. I have no idea why they don't package the license file with their gem distribution download (= ruby-specific tar archive). Regards, Hanno
