On 25.03.20 03:11, Sean Whitton wrote: > +----------------------+ > | REJECT reasoning | > +----------------------+ > > Looks to be LGPL not GPL.
Wow, what an oversight... Sorry about that. Fixed in git. > +----------------------+ > | Other comments | > +----------------------+ > > ci\.travis_*.sh look to have a different copyright holder and license. Those files indeed state "modified from [other GitHub repo]" but it seems to be more of an "inspired by" for how to solve a simple issue. travis_install.sh: 1. Installs packages in an environment 2. Prints Python module versions travis_test.sh 3. Prints Python module versions 4. Invokes nosetests I don't believe there is anything copyrightable there. Would you concur with this assessment? If not: the referenced GitHub repo contains no such files, only a .yml file where the step 1. - 4. above are used (hence my "inspired by" suspicion). So to err on the side of caution, I would simply remove those two files form the source (it's already being dfsg-cleaned anyway). In case I do the latter, I'd upload a new version to NEW with a +dfsg1 suffix -- is that correct? Thanks, Christian -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
