Hello, On Wed 25 Mar 2020 at 12:24PM +01, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 25.03.20 03:11, Sean Whitton wrote: >> ci\.travis_*.sh look to have a different copyright holder and license. > > Those files indeed state "modified from [other GitHub repo]" but it > seems to be more of an "inspired by" for how to solve a simple issue. > > travis_install.sh: > 1. Installs packages in an environment > 2. Prints Python module versions > > travis_test.sh > 3. Prints Python module versions > 4. Invokes nosetests > > I don't believe there is anything copyrightable there. Would you concur > with this assessment? > > If not: the referenced GitHub repo contains no such files, only a .yml > file where the step 1. - 4. above are used (hence my "inspired by" > suspicion). So to err on the side of caution, I would simply remove > those two files form the source (it's already being dfsg-cleaned anyway). > > In case I do the latter, I'd upload a new version to NEW with a +dfsg1 > suffix -- is that correct? Given that you are already doing a +dfsg filter I agree that the best option is probably just to add these files to that filter. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
