On 27.03.20 23:15, Sean Whitton wrote: > - can you confirm that images/tpot-logo.jpg is in its preferred form > for modification, i.e., the Adobe Illustrator source file has been > lost to the mists of time?
I wasn't aware that the image was created in Adobe Illustrator, but I don't believe that upstream would have lost it. While I figure this out with upstream (which may take time), would it be OK if I upload a +dfsg2 with the logo removed? It's anything but vital to the doc package. > - is the doc binary package name correct? I would have expected to > see tpot-doc. It's a common pattern for Python module doc packages to be named after the binary module package, eg: * src:scipy -> python3-scipy, python-scipy-doc * src:numpy -> python3-numpy, python-numpy-doc $ apt-cache search 'python-.*-doc' | wc -l 652 I found the practice of keeping the python- prefix for the -doc package odd (instead of switching to python3-), but I the Python2 removal page [1] states that a rename should not happen. However, as I just realized, this is not a rename, but a new upload. I'll ask debian-python, just to be sure. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
