Hello Christian, On Sat 28 Mar 2020 at 11:19AM +01, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 27.03.20 23:15, Sean Whitton wrote: >> - can you confirm that images/tpot-logo.jpg is in its preferred form >> for modification, i.e., the Adobe Illustrator source file has been >> lost to the mists of time? > > I wasn't aware that the image was created in Adobe Illustrator, but I > don't believe that upstream would have lost it. > > While I figure this out with upstream (which may take time), would it be > OK if I upload a +dfsg2 with the logo removed? It's anything but vital > to the doc package. Certainly. >> - is the doc binary package name correct? I would have expected to >> see tpot-doc. > > It's a common pattern for Python module doc packages to be named after > the binary module package, eg: > * src:scipy -> python3-scipy, python-scipy-doc > * src:numpy -> python3-numpy, python-numpy-doc > > $ apt-cache search 'python-.*-doc' | wc -l > 652 > > I found the practice of keeping the python- prefix for the -doc package > odd (instead of switching to python3-), but I the Python2 removal page > [1] states that a rename should not happen. > > However, as I just realized, this is not a rename, but a new upload. > I'll ask debian-python, just to be sure. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal I'm happy to take your word for it -- just wanted to ask :) -- Sean Whitton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
